Originally posted by Riek
Wow, Apple must really be trying to get off Santa's list this year.

http://www.theage.com.au/technology/...1203-k7nr.html
To most people, prior usage is a conclusive argument. And "most people" includes the courts that have jurisdiction over trademarks. Clearly Apple does not have the common sense God gave to a peanut.

Looking at it the other way: What is the use to Apple of winning this? Surely they won't make as much money as they're spending to crush this company. What's in it for them?