+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    Moderator
    Join Date
    August 8th, 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    4,210
    Originally posted by Bael
    A bit off topic, but you should be able to add latency to what VLC plays to get them to sync up. Physical audio splitters should work perfectly fine, you might have to turn up the level a negligible amount, but it shouldn't degrade the audio signal in any noticeable way. Or you could always invest in a headphone amp with multiple outputs. Depends on how often you do this kind of thing as to whether or not it's worth the investment.
    Yes, I could set delay, but it's something that has to be judged and keyed in (X ms), so it's not something that can smoothly be adjusted. We spent three or four minutes trying this before abandoning the notion. The phys splitter I had might have been dodgy, which would explain that problem; but since this sort of thing is extremely rare (mostly, if we both want to listen to the same thing, we'll just use larger speakers), it's not worth spending money on. However, if anything had HAD the feature, it would definitely have been handy.
    The man who gets angry at the right things and with the right people, and in the right way and at the right time and for the right length of time, is commended. - Aristotle (but not the Aristotle you're thinking of)

    The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing. - Albert Einstein
    Mainly to keep a lid on the world's cat population. - Anon

    I pressed the Ctrl key, but I'm still not in control!

  2. #12
    Tree Frog
    Join Date
    May 27th, 2003
    Location
    Powder Springs, GA
    Posts
    441
    Originally posted by Rosuav
    The phys splitter I had might have been dodgy, which would explain that problem; but since this sort of thing is extremely rare (mostly, if we both want to listen to the same thing, we'll just use larger speakers), it's not worth spending money on. However, if anything had HAD the feature, it would definitely have been handy.
    Maybe it is, but considering that most splitters contain less than 6 inches of physical wiring they shouldn't introduce any sort of interference, it should just take slightly more energy to drive the sound across 4 channels instead of 2. So it sounds like maybe there's a problem with the splitter. No idea though.

    As for the tape stuff. Yeah a lot of "good" tape players (on home stereo equipment) had Dolby selectors and another setting having something to do with "Metal" (or "Chrome") since there are two flavors of cassettes, ones made with chromium dioxide and ones made with ferric oxide. Which also effects the sound in a minute way.

    The problem is, MOST people had no idea about any of this or how to put any of this to use. So all they remember is shitty sound through a walkman (which didn't have any of these usually, mine didn't) or through a boombox, which had a minimal amount of this stuff. But IF you had a good home stereo and knew what you were doing, there was a reason why audio cassette were immensely popular.

  3. #13
    Tree Frog
    Join Date
    May 22nd, 2003
    Location
    FLA/Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    459
    walkman!!! thats nothing!! give the kid an 8 track player!
    Shuffle mode is pushing the button to the next track!!
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereo_8
    "The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people,
    it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government -
    lest it come to dominate our lives and interests". – Patrick Henry

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts