I noticed there hasn't been a thread about this current event, so now we have one for any developments.
Does this kill the case for the prosecution?
Second dancer calls Duke allegations a 'crock'
Of course, this just adds to the previous revelation that she had sex with someone else that day/night:A second exotic dancer in the Duke University sexual assault case told police early in their investigation that the accuser was out of her sight for only five minutes that night and that her allegations were a "crock," according to a court papers filed Thursday.
...
According to a March 20 statement written by a Durham police investigator, Roberts "stated that she heard that [the accuser] was sexually assaulted, which she stated is a 'crock' and she stated that she was with her the whole time until she left."
The defense lawyers argue that prosecutors omitted that statement when they got court permission in March to obtain photographs and DNA samples from team members.
Then there is also the fact that she made a false rape accusation very similar to this one a few years ago.The lawyers also say the accuser told a nurse who examined her that she was not choked and that no condoms were used by her attackers. Defense attorneys have said that DNA tests showed material recovered from the victim matched a single male source who was not a member of the lacrosse team.
This seems like a pretty dead case at this point. The evidence is pretty brutal for the prosecution.


Reply With Quote