Originally posted by Graeblyn
There is no attempt to differentiate between them because Kestra never brought up terrorists. You did. I know the beheading was posted on extremist web sites. YOU are the one who took that evil incident and set up the straw man that Kestra was comparing Scarborough to people who would behead innocent people. That wasn't Kestra, and it wasn't me. It was YOU who lumped terrorists and extremists in together. Trying to foist the whole thing off on Kestra's "failure" to add a disclaimer about something Kestra NEVER EVEN SAID is despicable.
You just got through saying that extremists sow the seeds of the terrorism. I am not aware of the sharp differentiation between the two terms you seem to be upset about here. On the one hand you want to tie rhetoric to terrorism, and on the other hand you are angry that I understand and acknowledge the comparison you make when you say extremists foment action. The difference is that one fellow is upset about morality, and the other argues for jihad against the west. Or are extremist websites only extremist, and not terrorist related, if they don't preach terrorism and jihad?

Look, I could go and find you even more inciteful right wing Christian sites than the one Kestra found if your purpose is just to get really angry about right wing Christians, but the worst, most right wing hate filled rag you want to look at is still not going to have as a selling point a video of someone cutting someone elses head off. That's my bottom line on this. Sorry if I offended you or Kestra. Oh, and I should not have referred to her as 'he' either. *wince*