sorry, haha

[Blog]

http://72.3.131.10/

don't miss the gallery, who are these people?

[Aristotle]

Bwahahaha.

What a bunch of morons.

That's the kind of thinking that is going to eventually result in one party having 60+ seats in the Senate, which won't be good for any of us.

Run your party like adults, twits.

[kiania]

To be honest, I've been supporting what they are doing. I'm not amercian, but I totally respect what they are trying to do, and have a few friends with pictures in the gallery.

America unfortunately does have a large effect on the rest of the world. I'm glad there is a competition against the people who voted for Bush.

I'm not going to get into any political banter here, but I respect what these people are doing, and think its great!

[Graeblyn]

Originally posted by Aristotle
Bwahahaha.

What a bunch of morons.

That's the kind of thinking that is going to eventually result in one party having 60+ seats in the Senate, which won't be good for any of us.

Run your party like adults, twits.

I take it, then, that you are not the Aristotle they thank so effusively on the homepage.

I do wish my fellow liberals would spend their time and donations on more worthwhile pursuits. I, for one, am focusing on 2008, but unfortunately a lot of dems are STILL stuck on the 2000 Election.

[Frobozz]

I dont support what they are doing at all. They are acting like 3 year old children that had their toy taken away after getting caught cutting the cat's hair.

This type of childish behavior might be acceptable in other countries, especially those that really dont have anything to lose by strife here, but these people need to learn responsibility for themselves.

The Democrats have become so far left that they are chasing away the former Pres. Clinton supporters to the middle, to Bush's camp. But who do they blame? The rest of the country, certainly not themselves. These pictures are proof of that.

Whiners = more votes for Bush. If this keeps up I can almost predict even more gains for the Republican party in 2006, and 2008 and personally I dont want to see that happen.

I would rather have democrats reach back into the main stream and connect with the people they allege to represent, the average American. Right now they represent left wing nut jobs and make no room for moderates, look at Lieberman he was all but exiled during the campaign while people like Ted Kennedy stood up for Kerry.

There is no justifiable reason to support this type of behavior. These people lost an election, big deal, learn from your mistakes and improve - adapt. The republicans learned from President Clinton and reached out to the middle, over dissent/criticism/etc from various groups. They brought legitimate moderates into the spot light, and they kicked ass.

The "rest" of the world has a serious problem. The "rest" of the world wants America to hand out money, to provide security, and provide humanitarian aid when things go bad. But the rest of the world needs to get its collective head out of its collective ass and realize that America has offered all of that and more.

The "rest" of the world needs to decide whether or not they want American help or they want America to recess back into an isolationist nation. The last time America went isolationist I remember reading that 6 million jews were killed in camps, 6 million others died with them in the same camps. America might not be camelot, but America provides the world with much more good than bad.

Where would Germany, Britian, France, and Russia be right now without the US? Thankfully Britian is a good ally, with good input/criticism. However, the "rest" of the world (France, Russia, Germany, China) can go collectively screw themselves. They get more than pissy when we try to interfere in their business, but refuse to get the hell out of ours.

American elections are the business of no one but Americans. I dont give a damn what people from other countries think. If you want America out of your business, stay out of ours.

[Frobozz]

Moreover,

This type of behavior (the pictures and whining) really fucking pisses me off. The liberals are trying to portray themselves as this bastion of "sanity" "sensibility" "compassion" "intelligence" and portray anyone that supported Bush as being a "redneck" "homophobe" "idiot" "retard". This behavior is discraceful and rather hypocritical. Liberals AND the rest of the world need to assume responsibility for what happend in this election.

Part of the reason Bush won was that so many people (4 million more than voted for Kerry) were outraged at the international push for Kerry and criticisms of those that supported Bush that more people came to the polls for him. I guess I should thank the international community for rallying people to Bush's side, but this site here is just a great example of people that can't accept the fact that they've become the minority party - that they are out of touch with the main stream.

Like I've said before, I dont think Bush is a good president but Kerry was a horrible alternative. The "rest" of the world is as much to blame for Bush being in office again as the liberals are. The liberals were too narrow minded to select Lieberman as their candidate refusing because of his religion, and the things they say now are a perfect example of their narrow minded zealotry that has driven a majority of Americans to the republican party.

People in the new middle may have to vote democrat across the board in the next 4 elections to undo the harm the "world" and the "liberals" have done by pushing this country so conservative.

The Democrats now call the country a bunch of unintelligent idiots, which is odd because the Democrats used to get the bread and butter of their votes off of groups that are historically uneducated (if at all) without access to equal opportunities as compared those the Republicans have leaned upon. Odd that.

Can't be the democrats fault... must be those homophobes

[kestra]

that website represents liberals? Wow!

[aelyn]

Out of curiosity, how representative do you *actually* think these people are of the way the democrats run their party as a whole? It seems to me to be mostly a bunch of young college and 20-somethings-who-have-internet-access, so how big of a slice is that?

[Graeblyn]

Originally posted by Frobozz
The liberals were too narrow minded to select Lieberman as their candidate refusing because of his religion, and the things they say now are a perfect example of their narrow minded zealotry that has driven a majority of Americans to the republican party.

I received enough literature from the candidates and their supporters during the primary process to wallpaper the White House. I got calls from their campaigns. I voted in the Democratic primary. At NO time did anyone, except Lieberman's supporters themselves, make reference to his judaism. At NO time did any of the candidates say anything derogatory about his faith. At NO time did any columnist, democratic pundit, or even any "letter to the editor" I recall EVER make a negative reference to Lieberman's faith. Lieberman HIMSELF has made no such claim, and nor have any prominent Jewish Democrats.

In fact, the most vocal people who seem to think Lieberman's faith played a role in his losing the primary nomination are extreme right commentators such as Limbaugh and Hannity. Accusing the Democratic Party of antisemitism simply because its members didn't automatically nominate someone just because they are a minority is as ridiculous as accusing YOUR party of racism for not nominating Keyes in 2000.

[Malacasta]

People in the new middle may have to vote democrat across the board in the next 4 elections to undo the harm the "world" and the "liberals" have done by pushing this country so conservative.

This has to be one of the funniest things I've read on this board for years.