+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Rice to Seattle

  1. #1
    Bullfrog
    Join Date
    June 17th, 2003
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    563

    Rice to Seattle

    Jerry Rice was traded to Seattle, getting his wish. He's been complaining that he needs a greater role on Oakland's offense and if they weren't willing to give it to him then he asked that they trade him away.

    They're not saying what Seattle gave away for Rice, but I can't imagine it was much. The dude *was* one of the greatest receivers ever but he's 42 and doesn't seem to have what it takes anymore. I would rather have seen him retire a few seasons ago.

  2. #2
    Fire Bellied Toad
    Join Date
    May 21st, 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,486
    Poor Rice. As you said he once was a great player. Who knows maybe he'll do something up there. Good luck to him!
    Love and stop lights can be cruel. J. Doherty

  3. #3
    Tree Frog
    Join Date
    May 21st, 2003
    Location
    Carrolltown, PA, USA
    Posts
    278
    Seattle gave Oakland a conditional 7th round draft pick for Rice.

    While I agree that Rice should have retired a few years ago, it's disgusting to see what Oakland was doing with him. You can't tell me Norv Turner didnt know that Rice didnt have a catch in that game his streak was broken. How hard would it be to throw a wr screen or something? They never told him they'd be using him as little as they are, which is probably the only reason he came back to play for them this year. I hate the Raiders. I am happy that Rice is going somewhere where he'll be put to good use though (maybe he can teach the Seahawks receivers to hold onto the damn balls)
    -> Liathano gets bet up by teh post.

  4. #4
    Administrator Aristotle's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 25th, 2001
    Location
    Washington, DC, USA
    Posts
    12,284
    I think Rice to Seattle is a really good move. As Liathano mentioned, the Seattle receivers can't seem to catch the damn ball.

    At least Rice will be able to do that.

    I also think its pretty shitty of the Raiders to tell rice he'll play a big role in the offense and then barely use him at all.

    The guy may be 42, but I don't think he's washed up yet. If you look at his stats from the last 3 years, you can see that he is still a capable possession receiver and could probably be a good 2nd or 3rd receiver:

    Code:
           Rec   Yards    Avg    Long   TD
    2001:   83    1139    13.7    40     9
    2002:   92    1211    13.2    75     7
    2003:   63     869    13.8    47     2
    Add the intangibles of his experience and mytique, and I think Seattle made a really smart move.

    A conditional 7th round pick is nothing.
    Capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my Uncle Jack off a horse." and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse."

    There is never a good time for lazy writing!

  5. #5
    Fire Bellied Toad
    Join Date
    May 20th, 2003
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,168
    Rice didn't do much last year (for him anyway), but I blame the Raiders for that more than Rice's age. The guy is declining, but he started out so high that declining for him is still pretty damn good. He's got the ability to contribute to any offense because he still has some of the best hands in the league and he's smart enough to get open.
    "Believe it or not, I'm a complete catch."

  6. #6
    Tree Frog
    Join Date
    May 23rd, 2003
    Location
    Portland Oregon
    Posts
    258
    Ill tell you exactly what Seattle doesnt need right now.

    A wide reciever.

    You got Robinson, who has dropped balls, but when he turned it around he was on freakin' fire, Jackson who is always steady, Bobby Engram who is a clutch player, and WHOEVER THE FUCK ELSE YOU CAN ONLY PAY LIKE 450k for. All those recievers are above Rice's current talent level, which puts him at a 4th reciever.

    The last thing you need on this team is an aging ex-superstar who needs minutes, eats up salary, and has questionable longevity. Hasslebeck has gelled with his recievers, and somehow has become one of the best qb's in the league, when the shit goes down. The Seattle offense works, why give away draft picks for someone who is gonna be gone in a year, and complain about playing time?

    I think someone in management in Seattle is a 49er fan, and is throwing his boy a big bone here.

  7. #7
    Tree Frog
    Join Date
    May 21st, 2003
    Location
    Carrolltown, PA, USA
    Posts
    278
    Originally posted by Serith
    Ill tell you exactly what Seattle doesnt need right now.

    A wide reciever.

    You got Robinson, who has dropped balls, but when he turned it around he was on freakin' fire, Jackson who is always steady, Bobby Engram who is a clutch player, and WHOEVER THE FUCK ELSE YOU CAN ONLY PAY LIKE 450k for.
    Engram is hurt, and Robinson is facing suspension for violating the league substance abuse policy.
    -> Liathano gets bet up by teh post.

  8. #8
    Administrator Aristotle's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 25th, 2001
    Location
    Washington, DC, USA
    Posts
    12,284
    Originally posted by Liathano
    Engram is hurt, and Robinson is facing suspension for violating the league substance abuse policy.
    And they are all dropping balls like crazy.

    Also, giving up a conditional 7th round pick really isn't giving up a whole lot.

    As for the salary: if they had the room this year then they may as well use it. It isn't like its doing them any good to be below the cap.
    Capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my Uncle Jack off a horse." and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse."

    There is never a good time for lazy writing!

  9. #9
    Tree Frog
    Join Date
    May 23rd, 2003
    Location
    Portland Oregon
    Posts
    258
    RAIDER TAINT!

    ONCE YOU GO BLACK YOU SHOULD NEVER GO BACK!

    Oakland is where players go to end careers, no more trades! Keep them coralled!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts