Originally posted by kestra
I don't blame him for not solving AIDS in his 8 year residency at the White House.
I blame him for his inaction when so many other countries saw how important this disease was to research.

Again, he could've acted sooner, he decided not to.
Right because it's mattered at all?

But this is part of being a leader. There are things you can do, that are attainable. There are other things that are simply unattainable. Reagin set out and did what he could, he made choices as a leader.

Why blame him? Why arent you blaming the scientific, religious, or other social organizations?