Results 1 to 10 of 39

Threaded View

  1. #25
    Tree Frog
    Join Date
    May 22nd, 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    432
    Why is it somehow a horrible, immoral thing to criticise someone just because they are recently dead? I agree that no one should be picketing Regan's funeral or butting in to his loved one's mourning to grill them about the man's AIDS policies. That would be immoral because of the pain it would cause to the people who had a strong personal relationship with the man. However, no matter how much you may respect or even revere him, no one here has a personal relationship with him. This isn't a forum of mourning, not a wake or a memorial. It's a web forum for political discussion, and political discussions get, well, political.

    If Siou's criticisms of Regan's policies were valid 1 year ago, when he was alive, or 5 years from now when he's been long dead, they are valid today. If they are invalid, they are not invalid because he's dead but on their own lack of merit. Discuss them on that basis, not on the basis that the recently-dead are somehow above criticism.
    Last edited by Grantref; June 10th, 2004 at 12:37 AM.
    "A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history, with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila."
    -Mitch Ratcliffe, Technology Review, April 1992

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts