Originally posted by Lokrian
To repeat, saying something mean and without much context makes you hard to understand.
Hardly. "Religous wrong" and "welfare brood mare" are not difficult to understand terms. You just don't like them.


Originally posted by Lokrian
As for the labelling problem, that's what people do.
Sometimes labels are appropriate. You, however, rely on them exclusively such that you are unable to deal with a situation where a label does not apply.

Originally posted by Lokrian
I'm not going to get to feeling guilty because you have a tendency to spit rude epithets though.
Sometimes the truth is unpleasant. Your inability to face that is your own failing, not mine.

Welfare brood mares deserve nothing but derision and there is nothing wrong with heaping on such legitimate descriptors.

You don't have any problem speaking ill of groups you dislike. I dislike groups who steal from hard working Americans by defrauding government handout programs.

Originally posted by Lokrian
I'm no more prone to labelling than anyone. You and Eorick both have a hard time talking about anything without throwing mud around though.
You are possibly the most prone to labelling of anyone on the forum. Frequently, your first response is a label rather than to simply stay on topic.

As for your accusation about throwing mud, perhaps you should look at your own hate mongering. Worry not about the speck in thy neighbors eye when thou hast a plank in thine own.

Originally posted by Lokrian
I have seen the damage broken families cause first hand.
Who hasn't?

Originally posted by Lokrian
I do not believe the insitution of marriage and family is disposable.
Who does?


Originally posted by Lokrian
Nothing is perfect, but I think things could be done to make it better.
Agreed. How about step 1 is not using it as a tool of hate?

If you want to help marriage, make it illegal to get married more than once every 10 years. That would put a damper on the mockery celebrities make of marriage.

Originally posted by Lokrian
I think trying to apply it to gay couples does further damage to it through added confusion.
What confusion? When two people love each other and want to spend their lives together they get married. How is that confusing?

If you really cared about society, you would embrace the stabilizing effect marriage has as a benefit.


Originally posted by Lokrian
If you don't have anything constructive to say about that, then the rest of this mess is really beside the point.
What kind of horseshit statement is that?

If we don't agree with you everything is beside the point? Pathetic.