View Poll Results: Did Manning choke or was he shut down by amazing defense?

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • Manning choked completely. (80% blame to Manning, 20% credit to defense)

    2 10.53%
  • Manning was mostly to blame, but if the defense hadn't been so insane, he might have been ok. (60% blame on Manning, 40% credit to defense).

    1 5.26%
  • Both. (50% blame on Manning, 50% credit to defense).

    5 26.32%
  • Manning was partially to blame, but it was more an amazing defensive performance (40% blame on Manning, 60% credit to defense).

    4 21.05%
  • Patriots defense played amazing. Manning did well considering how great they played. (80% credit to defense, 20% blame on Manning).

    5 26.32%
  • Neither. Marvin Harrison forgot to get on the airplane and was watching the game from Indianapolis.

    0 0%
  • Neither. The weather was to blame.

    2 10.53%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24
  1. #11
    Fire Bellied Toad
    Join Date
    May 20th, 2003
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,168
    Originally posted by Sebboe
    ... and the defense had no ability to stop the Patriots.
    Looking at the drive chart for the game I think the Colts D did more than enough to keep the Colts in the game. Out of the 24 points the Patriots scored, 2 were given to them by the Colts on the safety and 3 were handed to them by their defense. The Colts defense only gave up 19 points as far as I'm concerned. That's a pretty good game for the D, especially when you should be able to rely on your offense to put up 30+ points per game. The Patriots started with the ball in Colt's territory three times, and beyond their own 40 four times. That's 7 drives that have to go less than 60 yards! Out of those drives the Pats got a wopping 6 points. The Pats only had four drives over 50 yards, the Colts had that many! The longest Pats drive was 67 yards, not impressive. I'll give the Pats credit for their first two drives, those were well put together, but after that the Colts D held their own.

    The Pats win because they have the best D in the league, and damn good special teams. It puts their slightly above average offense in great positions. I'll give the Pats credit where they deserve it, but their offense isn't where it's at.
    "Believe it or not, I'm a complete catch."

  2. #12
    Bullfrog
    Join Date
    May 23rd, 2003
    Location
    Nashua, NH
    Posts
    716
    I think psychologically the Pats putting points up on the board 3 at a time was a big thing. Every time the Colts offense took the field, they were down more points than the last time they had the ball. That has to frustrate an offense that is struggling to pass but is running the ball well.
    Don't get too perky!

  3. #13
    Tree Frog
    Join Date
    May 23rd, 2003
    Location
    Portland Oregon
    Posts
    258
    Honestly, and I know people are gonna disagree with me on this one, I think it was almost ALL the Defense.

    Manning was coming off UNGODLY performances. Days like no one has ever seen in the playoffs. That doesnt make it his "normal" day. You Cant expect someone to repeat that, I cant believe he did it twice in a row, kudos to him... but welcome back to the NFL

    The weather? Eh.. I dunno, sure, they play in domes, but this is the NFL. Those boys can play anywhere. Brady looked sharp as shit in the exact same weather.

    In the NFL, against a sound, discimplined defense, that plays their positions, which is what NE does VERY well.... You cannot pass the ball all day. You have to establish the run, and KEEP doing it. they kept trying to do the "trick" formations, where they'd have 4 wide, un 2 bunches, and yes, that did confuse NE for all of ONE series.... but then they KEPT doing it.

    Ive watched manning all year, and he is a momentum QB I think. When he gets the ball going his way.. he gets better, and better, and has fucking awesome days. But as SOON as shit starts going on... it gets worse, and worse.... because they wont go back to the run to chill him out.

    I thought he still had a decent game though. If I was gonna pass around blame, id do it evenly. Freeney didnt have the game he was touted to, the offensive line got worked, James actually did REALLY good, but they never gave him a chance, Wayne caught balls, Harrison got open, but everytime they were passed to they got LEVELED by the safeties.

    The coverage was fucking awesome. The pass rush was amazing. When they were in man, they stuck it tight... and when they were in zone they only allowed small yardage.

    So. Yes, Manning is no god. No QB can be held responsible for an entire loss (Maybe Brett Farve) he didnt have his PHENOMENAL day like with Denver and KC. You know what? Hats off to NE.

    Way to play ball.

  4. #14
    Administrator Aristotle's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 25th, 2001
    Location
    Washington, DC, USA
    Posts
    12,284
    Originally posted by Damieux
    I think the picks and the fumbles can be attributed to the weather, which must have made the ball slick and hard as a rock and certainly impacted visibility. Basically, I think the Colts simply weren't accustomed to playing in adverse weather conditions (because they haven't had to do so all year), and I think that heavily impacted their game.
    Did you actually watch the game?

    1 of the picks was an unbeliveably amazing play by Ty Law.

    1 of the picks was because Manning overestimated the height of the DE.

    2 of the picks were moronic throws that shouldn't have been made.

    Marvin Harrison's fumble was just being a pussy and coughing up the ball when he got hit.

    None of those were weather related.
    Capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my Uncle Jack off a horse." and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse."

    There is never a good time for lazy writing!

  5. #15
    Administrator Aristotle's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 25th, 2001
    Location
    Washington, DC, USA
    Posts
    12,284
    Originally posted by Isaviel
    There were a couple questionable calls
    The only bad calls I thought were the last 2 on the Colt's final drive. Otherwise I think it was a well called game that the Pats controlled throughout.

    There was defensive holding two plays in a row and it is a damn shame that neither one got called. It would have been exciting to see if the Colts could have gotten their shit together and rallied.
    Capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my Uncle Jack off a horse." and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse."

    There is never a good time for lazy writing!

  6. #16
    Administrator Aristotle's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 25th, 2001
    Location
    Washington, DC, USA
    Posts
    12,284
    Originally posted by Gadiantor
    I think the Colts D did more than enough to keep the Colts in the game. Out of the 24 points the Patriots scored, 2 were given to them by the Colts on the safety and 3 were handed to them by their defense. The Colts defense only gave up 19 points as far as I'm concerned. That's a pretty good game for the D, especially when you should be able to rely on your offense to put up 30+ points per game.
    That's my feeling as well. Furthermore, the last 3 of those 19 were at the end when the game was over.

    The Colts D performed very well- above expectations. Holding the Pats to all those field goals was excellent. Usually, if you hold a team to 5 field goals when you have a great offense, you win.
    Capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my Uncle Jack off a horse." and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse."

    There is never a good time for lazy writing!

  7. #17
    Administrator Aristotle's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 25th, 2001
    Location
    Washington, DC, USA
    Posts
    12,284
    Originally posted by Serith
    Ive watched manning all year, and he is a momentum QB I think. When he gets the ball going his way.. he gets better, and better, and has fucking awesome days. But as SOON as shit starts going on... it gets worse, and worse.... because they wont go back to the run to chill him out.
    I think you are dead on about Manning. David Greene (UGA's QB) plays the same way. I consider that style to be a very dangerous weakness because things don't always go your way. You have to be a scrapper to win the tough games.

    I also agree with you that considering the insane coverage downfield they should have relied on the run more. If they had pounded them with Edge for a full quarter or so that might have softened up the secondary enough to let Manning get on a roll.

    Who knows. That is what makes football awesome. Strategy and tactics matter.
    Capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my Uncle Jack off a horse." and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse."

    There is never a good time for lazy writing!

  8. #18
    Tree Frog
    Join Date
    May 26th, 2003
    Location
    New York State, USA
    Posts
    367
    Originally posted by Aristotle
    I also agree with you that considering the insane coverage downfield they should have relied on the run more. If they had pounded them with Edge for a full quarter or so that might have softened up the secondary enough to let Manning get on a roll.
    I wondered about that when I was watching the game. They had a drive going with a number of good runs in a row and then they gave up on running the ball for pretty much the rest of the game. Go figure.
    My mama always tol' me I should'a been a fighter.

    Kerrin's Web Site: http://www.thewildhunt.com/thegreen/kerrin.shtml

  9. #19
    Tree Frog
    Join Date
    May 21st, 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    145
    I haven't been on the forums in awhile so this is coming -way- late.

    I have to give it up to the Pat's D. Manning made some bad throws, but that's what happens when you are being hurried, knocked down, and sacked all day. You throw offbalance and rushed, you throw poorly. Ty Law went the extra mile to haul in one -amazing- pick, to boot.

    After the KC win I said something on the sports channel to the effect of "Manning is going to get tons of hype after spending 2 weeks picking apart mediocre secondaries with all day to throw the ball. Then he's going to come to NE and have about .25 seconds to unload it into an excellent secondary and get picked about 3 times." Manning is a great QB, but no one puts up the kind of numbers against the Pats D like he had been against KC and Denver.

    Beyond just Manning, the Pats D was hitting HARD. Just like they did against StL in the last Superbowl, if you -do- get yards against them, it comes at a heavy price, physically. You can't fault a guy too much for dropping a pass or coughing up the ball when he's getting hammered like that every time he comes near it.

    This is what the Pat's D does. They have an exceptional system, and they adapt weekly to their new opponent. You might fool them at first, but after that drive they'll adjust to whatever you're throwing at them. At the same time, they throw new looks and personel at the O the whole game through. Hurry-up offenses and audibles are less effective, because they can play a variety of D's with the same personel on the field.

    They're a talented group across the board, so you can't throw away from a star safety or double-up on a star lineman or reciever. Someone else will step up and make the play. They only had 2 men picked for the Probowl because they are a consisent team. You're generally -not- going to get 100+ yds a game as a runningback, or 4 TD catches as a reciever, or 3 sacks as a rusher. But at the end of the day what you -will- get is the one stat that matters; W. And at the end of the season what you -will- get, is a Superbowl ring. If you can stand winning the big the game without the spotlight necessarily shining on -you-, you'll be happy in NE's system.

    That is how NE is managing to put together a sort of mini-dynasty in this age of salary caps. By having a great system and great coaching, you can keep a team of consistent, non-superstar players doing the job. No Leons need apply.

    OH! I nearly forgot. One other glaring penalty was the Colts drive where the playclock was at about negative 5 and there was -still- no flag. I can't recall exactly but I believe it resulted in a first down and eventual touchdown, where it should have been a 3rd and extremely long and most likely a punt. I think the refs did do a pretty good job of 'letting the boys play'. There was a fair amount of clutching and pushing-off on either side of the ball, but it was all pretty marginal stuff, imho.

    Okay, that's my humble and entirely unbiased view of the game and the Pats! See ya at the Superbowl!

    http://tinyurl.com/2hcll6

    >dirnk ale
    what?
    >drink ael
    you possess no ael to drink.
    >drinka le
    what?
    >draught

  10. #20
    Administrator Aristotle's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 25th, 2001
    Location
    Washington, DC, USA
    Posts
    12,284
    Originally posted by Arrgruff

    OH! I nearly forgot. One other glaring penalty was the Colts drive where the playclock was at about negative 5 and there was -still- no flag.
    Dude. Reel in the massive home town bias.

    It was about a half a second and that sort of thing happens every week. The rule is that the ref has to see it tick to 0 then look down to see if the ball has been snapped.

    That's pretty darn irrelevant compared to two GLARING defensive holding penalties that would have kept the Colts drive alive when they were only down 1 score.

    For the sake of Karma, you should try to be a LITTLE bit objective.
    Capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my Uncle Jack off a horse." and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse."

    There is never a good time for lazy writing!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts