Turns out it probably isn't his after all, what a horrible horrible story.
The Telegraph story:
http://tinyurl.com/ar7h3c
Seriously, wtf?
Printable View
Turns out it probably isn't his after all, what a horrible horrible story.
The Telegraph story:
http://tinyurl.com/ar7h3c
Seriously, wtf?
Yeah, because clearly she's such an innocent, virtuous girl.Quote:
However, Chantelle and her family claim the two boys are lying and insist Alfie is the only boyfriend she has had.
I am aware that this will only paint me further as a contrarian pcer in some people’s minds, but why does a sexually active 14-year-old girl lose the ability to be honest? Why couldn’t the 12-year-old boy be a liar? Or the 16-year-old boy or the 14-year-old boy?
I really do believe it is important to sit back and look at our assumptions and generalizations regularly to see whether we’re letting lazy stereotypes influence the way we think. I find - more often than I like - that I sink into talk back radio reactions because it is easier and funnier and crueler and wittier and ‘more real’ to make nasty and misanthropic statements than it is to hold back an opinion that is considered and boring god-forbid ‘pc’. But calling this girl a liar because she’s a slut – which is what the inference of this whole media storm is, reinforces the meme that women cannot be sexually active without losing or lessening their other virtues.
Remember, this girl was only 15 years old when she gave birth.
I can’t think of many men that don’t boast about the time when they were 12 and spent their seed on some pre-teens chest. It’s such a fucking banal question, but why is it cool for a 12 year old boy to masturbate inside a pre-teen girl’s body till he comes, but an act that condemns the girl as non ‘virtuous’ or non ‘innocent’ and therefore somehow ‘less’ than another girl.
People who suggest these things, don’t seem to understand that the girls they came on or came in probably would have as productive and interesting and intellectually challenging lives if only they weren’t judged and ostracized as sluts and whores and liars and if only they didn’t perceive themselves that way.
They perceive themselves this way because other people perceive them this way, which means people like YOU perceive them this way. So stop it. Why contribute to something destructive when you don’t have to, even if that means you’re *omg* being pc.
Because she is lying.
http://www.theage.com.au/world/dna-t...0327-9d5d.html
Yep Riek, I didn't catch that post. But that doesn't in any way change what I was saying in my post. You posted a source that demonstrated she was lying. Ari said that she was lying because she ''wasn't 'innocent' or 'virtuous'. This is a single case, an anecdote. It is the sort of case that is used to 'prove a rule' except it doesn't.
Right? Or are all 14 year old girls who have sex without innocence or virtue?
And I can't think of a SINGLE under 16 boy who would claim to be the father of a child just for kicks, knowing full well that he'll be plastered all over British tabloids, having seen the fate of the other lad.Quote:
I can’t think of many men that don’t boast
I agree with a lot of your posts, but that was a total crock of feminist shit.
And who the fuck ever said it was cool? Wasn't there a whole massive thread condemning it on every side?
Get a grip, your post here is drivel.
I second that.Quote:
Originally posted by khaltek
I agree with a lot of your posts, but that was a total crock of feminist shit.
I agree with Malacasta on this one. Admittedly she was very passionate about it but people should be. Teenage girls are very impressionable and self-esteem is so easily broken at young ages, especially when there is a lot of things to compound those impressions laid on them. Which more often than not there are plenty of layers of negativity in any teenage girl's lives.Quote:
Originally posted by Loigan
I second that.
Why does having sex automatically make someone a slut? Does it mean that a 14 year old girl is off having sex for pleasure? Probably not, she's probably doing it because she craves the attention and calling a girl a slut would only reinforce that belief in her head that it's a viable way to obtain that attention.
It's not feminist crap - it's more just an understanding that teenage girls are very vulnerable and needy at those ages. If anything your argument only proves Malacasta's point, she tries to make a valid statement to try to open someone's eyes and you write it off on feminism.
P.S. As an aside, I am not a feminist. I think most of them go too far. But I've been a teenage girl before, I'm raising a girl who is almost a teenager, and my neice who is one. I speak from experience. If you found out your little girl was sexually active, would you call her a slut?
Having sex for attention makes her an attention whore, not a slut.Quote:
Originally posted by Rijiny
Why does having sex automatically make someone a slut? Does it mean that a 14 year old girl is off having sex for pleasure? Probably not, she's probably doing it because she craves the attention and calling a girl a slut would only reinforce that belief in her head that it's a viable way to obtain that attention.
This tips the scales to make her a slut.Quote:
Nicola Patten, 43, the 13-year-old's mother, said he had not doubted the paternity of the week-old child until now.
But on Sunday two boys, aged 14 and 16, both claimed they could be the father of 15-year-old Chantelle Steadman's daughter.
Several others have also claimed to have had a sexual relationship with the schoolgirl, from Eastbourne in Sussex.
I dont know what the exact stats are for sluthood, but what ever they are I am sure this girl meets them.Quote:
Originally posted by Rijiny
P.S. As an aside, I am not a feminist. I think most of them go too far. But I've been a teenage girl before, I'm raising a girl who is almost a teenager, and my neice who is one. I speak from experience. If you found out your little girl was sexually active, would you call her a slut?
3+ sexual partners at 14-15, a baby, an unknown father, and baby daddy drama is a slut in my book. So yes, if I had a daughter, niece, or grandchild that met these hall of fame stats, I'd stamp them as sluts too.
-Etruscan
My point isn't that this girl isn't promiscuous when it seems she clearly is, my point is that calling a girl a slut (or an equivalent) does nothing but make the situation worse. Girls like this need help, not judgements.
Calling her promiscuous is still judging her ;) , it just sounds nicer.Quote:
Originally posted by Rijiny
My point isn't that this girl isn't promiscuous when it seems she clearly is, my point is that calling a girl a slut (or an equivalent) does nothing but make the situation worse. Girls like this need help, not judgements.
Exactly. The fact that they are in my family would make no difference, if someone related to me was in this situation then yes their name would definitely go under the category of 'slut' in my mind.Quote:
Originally posted by Etruscan
I dont know what the exact stats are for sluthood, but what ever they are I am sure this girl meets them.
3+ sexual partners at 14-15, a baby, an unknown father, and baby daddy drama is a slut in my book. So yes, if I had a daughter, niece, or grandchild that met these hall of fame stats, I'd stamp them as sluts too.
-Etruscan
By definition they are without innocence and virtue.Quote:
Originally posted by Malacasta
Right? Or are all 14 year old girls who have sex without innocence or virtue?
And odds are, sexually active teens are not having sex just once. Sexually active teens that get pregnant are almost definitely doing it more than once. Even very fertile people still generally require more than one roll in the sack to get pregnant.
Furthermore, the same bad judgement, bad upbringing, bad circumstances, or all of the above that lead them to have sex once at that age generally lead them to have sex a lot of times.
So yes, you are being PC in the extreme... again.