To an extent. But you can't expect someone who's used MS Windows and MS Office to just sit down on a Linux box and use it. Linux needs a lot more work on usability before it'll quite achieve that. HOWEVER! This is not necessarily a bad thing. There's something appealing about a computer knowledge criterion prior to using a real operating system. All the 12-year-old twinks, the morons, and the people who "don't want to understand computers, just want to do email and internet" - let them use Windows. Intelligent people can choose something better.Quote:
Originally posted by karahd
Mac OS -> Vastly different and simplified
Linux -> Actually does not require that level of knowledge. You would need someone to set it up for you, but Windows people who don't know anything need people to set up their systems, too.
Yep. IBM largely dropped OS/2 a long time ago - in fact, they tried to on many occasions. But the OS/2 community keeps it alive. There's lots of places where people are writing things for OS/2 - applications, drivers, compilers, the lot. Serenity Systems now distributes OS/2, under the name eComStation (eCS) - they've made a few things worse (Windows-style wizards where they're not needed!), but a lot of things better. Underneath it all, though, the base code hasn't needed to change for years. In fact, OS/2 Warp 4 (which was really the last big change to the kernel) was released August 1996 - coming up to a decade. One of the beauties of OS/2 is that the base code is so flexible that a third-party programmer can do whatever he needs to, flexibly and (in practically all cases) safely, without any changes needed to the base code.Quote:
Not only is OS/2 not popular, but it is also no longer offered by IBM and standard support ends on the last day of 2006.
So... OS/2 may not be popular, and IBM may be dropping support at the end of this year (I'm not certain that will actually happen though), but OS/2 is far from dead.
